“The Purpose’’ By T.P.Kailasam
Introduction :-
This play “The Purpose’’ is written by very
famous and well-known playwright T. P. Kailasam. His real or full
name is Thyagaraja Paramasiva Kailasam. He was born in 1884 and died
in 1946. He was a playwright and prominent writer of Kannada
literature. His contribution to Kannada theatre comedy earned him the
title Prahasana Prapitamaha, "the father of humorous plays"
and later he was also called as "Kannadakke Obbane Kailasam"
means "One and Only Kailasam for Kannada".
We study about
Indian writing in English to Indian writer like T.P.Kailasam. He was
written at different and post colonial thinks in portrayed Ekalavya
character. The Purpose by T. P. Kailasam is a drama in two acts. The
story is based on Adiparva from ‘The Mahabharata”. As we see
that in the story how Kailasam given margin and criticize to Arjun
and Dhrona Characters. The story moves around Ekalavya and Arjun and
their purpose behind learning archery. Both want to learn archery
from the great Dronacharya. But we see post colonial thinks in
Ekalavya characters are center and periphery to Ajuna’s character.
When the story goes that ancient time in only for Brahmins teaching
to Shatriya, not any other caste person. Ekalavya was lower caste
person and he was learning to Dronacharya. He was teaching to great
Raja and his sons.
We see in the story
of Ekalavya that Dronacharya teaches archery to Arjuna but cannot
accept Ekalavya proposal because of his promise to Arjuna. Arjuna
wants to become the great archer of the world. And Ekalavya explains
that he wants to learn archery to save lives of innocent animals.
Arjuna’s purpose behind learning archery is self centered while
Ekalavya purpose is noble.
But we see that Ekalavya purpose was diffenrt to Arjuna and how
Kailasam given image to Drona was bad teacher and only selfish to his
economy, politics and love of Arjuna. We see in the 2nd act Ekalavya
is far ahead than Arjuna in archery. In anger Arjuna says that he
will tell everyone that Guru Drona has not kept his vow. To save his
Guru from social criticism Ekalavya gives his thumb as gurudakshina.
After giving his thumb in gurudakshina Ekalavya realizes that his
purpose behind learning archery was to save lives of innocent animals
but now he cannot look into the eyes of the animals. The drama ends
with Ekalavya crying. How we see colonial thinks in Ekalavya was
center and how his voice against to society. The readers are looking
at one story from different perspectives and that are of the writers.
Kailasam created truths in their individual
perspectives. Their individual perspectives are contradictory. The
Mahabharata is the story of kings and prices and in The Purpose T. P.
Kailasam has given voice to a marginalized. Kailasam has given
different point of view and he was center in The Purpose but The
Mahabharata marginalized character and Arjuna becomes hero and center
to tem. When time goes ahead Kailasam portrayed post colonial thinks
and subaltern can voice to society. In this story we see to Ekalavya
was hero and only for fault of Dronacharya.
So
we can say that post colonial thinks and center became periphery and
periphery became center in the story. We cannot prove Ved Vyasa right
and T. P. Kailasam wrong. So the reality presented by the writers is
just their individual perspective not the truth.
Deconstruct the theory of myth in The Purpose.
Here ‘The Purpose’ is a mythical play that deals with past
and its show us many things like culture, religion and the ancient
time of India. ‘Mythical story is always a fable of people’ it’s
like a tell that spreading our culture and its value. By the time of
king’s rule we can say that some people are creates a kind of view
towards it. But in the way myth is;
“By a myth ... I
mean primarily a certain type of
story in which some
of the chief characters are
gods or other beings
larger in power than humanity.”
~ Northrop Frye
Kailasam’s plays have a Uniform technical excellence and
for this, C.R. Reddy has said that,
“Greater than any
writer I have known is Kailasam in dramatic technique.”
Kailasam tried to high-light something which in original myth was
neglected. Let’s see how the play Wright made changes in original
myth and the reason being behind it. To know about all the things
first of all we have to understand this both the Characters. It is
very important to understand the play deeply.
No comments:
Post a Comment